Don't know whether to laugh or cry. Disappointing to see a few of these made the list, while much more literary fiction didn't.
Data from Guardian.co.uk:
I've read:
All the Harry Potters
Angels & Demons (I was curious! And underwhelmed.)
Tried first Stephenie Meyer but threw it aside.
The Lovely Bones (Underwhelmed)
Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time (Enjoyed very much)
The Kite Runner (")
Time-Traveler's Wife (Okay. Liked it medium-ish)
Atonement (Liked very much)
No. 1 Ladies' Detective Agency (Enjoyed very much)
Birdsong (Underwhelmed)
Labyrinth (Enjoyed)
Captain Corelli (Took forever to get into, then loved it)
Eats, Shoots and Leaves (Underwhelmed)
Very Hungry Caterpillar (Kids loved it!)
Chocolat (Enjoyed)
Angela's Ashes (Enjoyed, but so depressing!)
To Kill a Mockingbird (A classic, read several times, but a bit over-rated)
Catcher in the Rye (see above TKAM – even more over-rated)
Brick Lane (Enjoyed)
A Spot of Bother (Greatly enjoyed)
And that's it for me. But several of these – including many cookbooks and bios of people I'm not at all curious about – would never make my reading list, anyway. I'm getting more discriminating the older I get!
Sharon Osbourne? Really?
Sigh.
I may be the only person in the reading world who doesn’t understand the appeal of Dan Brown. Poor and uninspiring writing.
LikeLike
Having worked at a library for just over five years now, I’ve learned a lot of things about the general public’s taste in reading. And pretty much all of it’s depressing.
LikeLike